Revolutionizing Biology: The Impact of Big Data on Genetics
Written on
The Evolution of Population Genetics
With the emergence of vast, high-resolution data sets, biologists are now able to analyze genetic diversity patterns on an unprecedented scale.
Historically, since its inception in the 1920s, population genetics has grappled with data limitations. The primary goal of this field has been to investigate gene flow and changes over time, space, and various species while identifying the evolutionary forces at play. For many years, however, researchers faced significant obstacles due to a lack of available data.
In the foundational years, pioneers like Wright, Haldane, and Fisher operated without the means to analyze genes at a molecular level. Their contributions were largely theoretical. For instance, Fisher's seminal 1930 work, "The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection," adeptly integrated Mendelian principles with Darwin's natural selection theory but lacked empirical data. The landscape shifted dramatically in 1953 when Watson and Crick utilized X-ray crystallography to uncover the double helix structure of DNA. This pivotal advancement facilitated the development of molecular analysis techniques, allowing for direct data collection on genetic material.
Since that time, methods for gathering genetic data have significantly advanced, resulting in an overwhelming amount of information. The current challenge lies not in the scarcity of data but in its abundance. With extensive information on gene markers, individual organisms, and entire species across various habitats, traditional analytical methods have become inadequate. As a result, the field has embraced big data, which encompasses innovative analytical techniques designed to tackle the three V's: volume, velocity, and variety. This approach enables researchers to explore genetic changes and flow on a broader scale than ever before, yielding surprising insights.
Unraveling Long-standing Questions in Genetics
A significant question in population genetics concerns the relationship between reproductive strategies and genetic diversity. The theory suggests that species characterized by high birth rates and minimal parental care (r-selected) should exhibit greater genetic diversity compared to those with lower birth rates and higher parental investment (K-selected). For instance, insects fall into the r-selected category, while humans exemplify K-selected traits. The theory posits that higher offspring numbers allow for broader gene dispersal and mutation, facilitating evolution. However, empirical validation of this theory has proven challenging due to the extensive data involved.
In a groundbreaking study leveraging big data, researchers examined the genome-wide diversity of 76 non-model animal species by sequencing the transcriptomes of two to ten individuals from each species. This study encompassed a diverse range of taxa, complicating the dataset further. The findings revealed that genetic diversity was not influenced by geographical location, invasive status, or other factors previously thought significant. Instead, it was found that genetic diversity was strongly associated with key species traits linked to parental investment: species that are long-lived or have lower reproductive rates and brood care showed less genetic diversity than their short-lived or highly fecund counterparts.
Advancements in big data not only provide answers to longstanding questions in population genetics but also hold the potential to unlock myriad other solutions, potentially influencing conservation policies in both immediate and long-term contexts.
The Human Influence on Genetic Diversity
Another significant application of big data involves assessing how human activities impact the genetic diversity of various species. The scientific community widely acknowledges that we are currently experiencing the sixth mass extinction, referred to as the Anthropocene, largely driven by human actions such as overfishing, fossil fuel consumption, and plastic pollution. This era is marked by a pronounced loss of biodiversity, with approximately 92% of terrestrial species and 95% of marine species facing threats of decline or extinction. While the overarching effects of human activity on species are recognized, evaluating these impacts at the regional level has posed numerous challenges.
Researchers from the University of Copenhagen addressed these challenges using big data techniques. They "georeferenced 92,801 mitochondrial sequences across over 4,500 terrestrial mammal and amphibian species." This methodology involved correlating specific DNA sequences with the geographic locations of the species. The study concluded that species residing nearer to human populations exhibited reduced genetic diversity. The team hopes their findings will significantly influence local conservation policies and practices.
Challenges and Considerations in Big Data
There is no doubt that big data is ushering in a transformative era in biology. "This is an incredibly exciting period as the field transitions from just a handful of studies to potentially hundreds on the horizon," remarked Sean Hoban. "It feels as though we are embarking on a new chapter of scientific progress." However, not all experts share this enthusiasm.
A paper published in March 2021 in the journal Ecology Letters articulated three primary concerns regarding the use of big data in biological research. First, data selection poses a problem; with the vast quantity of available data, determining which data should be included in analyses can be subjective. Authors of the paper warned that researchers might selectively choose data that leads to preferred outcomes. Second, there are concerns regarding the completeness of datasets, as they may reflect the biases of those compiling the information, potentially omitting crucial data. Third, data interpretation is often subjective, as demonstrated by the authors' re-evaluation of previous studies, which revealed unsupported conclusions.
Despite these challenges, the issues surrounding big data are not unique to biology; other disciplines have navigated similar hurdles. Just as those fields have adapted, biology will also evolve and mature through the integration of big data techniques.