Chapter 1: The Intriguing Future of Technology

In the past few weeks, I shared an article discussing how an extensive history of intelligent civilizations could influence our universe. Surprisingly, the piece garnered significant attention, sparking a variety of reactions—some favorable, others critical, and a few outright negative. This prompted me to delve deeper into the points raised by readers.

The concepts presented in my article had been simmering in my mind for years. However, two recent influences helped crystallize my thoughts: "Death's End," the final installment of Cixin Liu's remarkable trilogy, and "Extraterrestrial," a thought-provoking work by Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb.

Both texts challenge our overly simplistic views of extraterrestrial intelligence. Influenced perhaps by popular culture, we often imagine aliens as benevolent beings eager to engage with us. When hostile extraterrestrials appear, as seen in films like "Independence Day," humanity's resilient spirit triumphs in the end.

However, the truth may be significantly more severe. We have no solid basis for assuming that an alien civilization would be friendly. If they decided to eliminate us, our chances of survival would be slim. Liu refers to the cold reality of interstellar communication, or "cosmic sociology," which could explain why we have yet to detect life elsewhere in the cosmos. In essence, the prevailing theory is that all potential civilizations are either concealing themselves or have perished.

This leads to a central theme of my article: advancements in technology and science. Historically, we've witnessed several revolutionary breakthroughs in scientific understanding, each leading to innovations that were unimaginable just decades prior. Quantum physics serves as a prime example—a breakthrough that paved the way for lasers, computers, and even nuclear weapons. Other significant milestones include the discovery of electricity, the theory of relativity, and the principles of thermodynamics.

We should anticipate similar revolutions in the future, but we must also recognize that these transformations are often unpredictable until they occur. In fifty years, our grasp of physics could remain relatively unchanged, or it could evolve dramatically, offering a deeper comprehension of the universe. This represents a known unknown: we are aware that the future will differ from the present, but the specifics elude us.

A secondary theme that emerged involves our observations of the universe and how we rationalize the unexplained phenomena. For instance, consider dark matter. A century ago, astronomers discovered that galaxies rotate faster than predicted by Newton's laws. Neither Newton nor Einstein could account for this, leading scientists to introduce the concept of dark matter to resolve the discrepancies.

While this concept may seem far-fetched, it has allowed scientists to address various issues, from the rotation of galaxies to the overall structure of the universe. However, as Avi Loeb provocatively questions, how does this differ from positing that extraterrestrial beings are responsible? Why is an eleven-dimensional universe deemed more plausible than the existence of advanced alien civilizations employing science beyond our current understanding? Given the prevalence of Earth-like planets and the abundance of life-sustaining elements, why should we assume we are alone? Despite its theoretical utility, we still lack a definitive understanding of what dark matter truly is.

The culmination of these arguments provides a potential solution to the Fermi Paradox—why we haven't detected alien life. It might simply be that we are oblivious to what we should be searching for, failing to recognize signs that could be evident. The notion that the night sky is an illusion is both captivating and extravagant, yet it may not be much more radical than other scientific theories.

A critical consideration that ignited controversy is the potential danger posed by extraterrestrial civilizations. Some individuals contested the notion that aliens might wish to annihilate humanity, suggesting that as civilizations evolve, they simultaneously bear moral responsibilities. Others questioned why a highly advanced society would even notice our existence.

To grasp why this viewpoint is flawed, we must revisit the concept of cosmic sociology—that civilizations are either hidden or extinct. Interstellar diplomacy and communication differ vastly from terrestrial practices. Sending a message to an alien civilization could take years or even centuries. The faster-than-light communication depicted in "Star Trek" remains purely fictional. In reality, a spacecraft like the Enterprise would be an isolated bastion of humanity, separated from any other civilization by light-years.

This inevitable delay in communication limits our knowledge of an alien society. Imagine discovering aliens near a star just twenty light-years away. Initial exchanges that last decades might reveal that they possess comparable technology. Initially, this wouldn't seem to pose a significant threat to our survival.

However, there is a forty-year gap between sending a message and receiving a reply. This time frame could witness a sudden scientific breakthrough, enabling them to develop unimagined technologies. If such advancements occur, we might be powerless to defend ourselves until it is too late.

This logic extends throughout the galaxy. No matter the disparity in technological capabilities, the risk of an unforeseen breakthrough always looms. Coupled with the challenges of comprehending an alien mindset, the harsh realities of cosmic sociology become apparent.

To preemptively eliminate any potential threats, the rational course of action would be to obliterate any discovered civilization, regardless of its perceived weakness. Consequently, every civilization must acknowledge that it could face sudden, catastrophic extinction. The inevitable outcome is a galaxy filled with civilizations concealing their existence, striving to avoid provoking suspicion from others.

It is essential to recognize that this line of reasoning rests on its own assumptions. There may be methods of faster-than-light communication. Perhaps it is impossible to completely disguise one's presence, making concealment an imprudent strategy. Nonetheless, the potential for danger remains, and until we gain a clearer understanding of what exists beyond our planet, we must tread cautiously.

China and Russia have recently expressed intentions to establish a research base on the Moon. This partnership is intriguing—Russia's space capabilities are waning, while China's are on the rise—but it remains to be seen how much progress they will make.

At present, neither nation possesses the means to send humans to the Moon or construct a base there. China has made strides toward a manned Moon landing, primarily through robotic missions and the development of more powerful rockets. However, they remain at least a decade away from achieving this goal.

Initial plans sensibly prioritize a robotic base. China aims to conduct further lunar missions to lay groundwork near the lunar south pole, with the 2030s potentially witnessing advanced missions and perhaps even the first Chinese manned landing near the base. A more enduring human presence could materialize by mid-century.

Recently, the Hubble Space Telescope entered a safe mode due to a software issue. Controllers resolved the problem and restored normal operation, but this incident serves as a reminder of the telescope's advancing age. While astronomers are confident it can continue functioning for several more years, it will eventually require another repair mission or risk being decommissioned.

In contrast, the more advanced James Webb Space Telescope has concluded its final tests and is set to be shipped to French Guiana for launch on an Ariane 5 rocket in October.

Much of the reporting on health, science, and space exploration tends to be unrealistic, exaggerated, and misleading. These topics are intricate, often lacking straightforward answers. Therefore, what is truly needed is thoughtful analysis, open discussion, and an exploration of the potential paths forward.

For more insights, follow me and subscribe to my free Substack newsletter to stay updated. Articles are published regularly, ensuring you won't miss any developments.

Chapter 2: The Deep Future of Technology

The first video titled "The Deep Future? It Starts With Believing In It | Walter Van De Velde | TEDxLeuven" explores the importance of belief in shaping our technological future.

The second video titled "From Futurism to Public Thinking: Global Issues Beyond AI, Technology and Business" discusses the broader implications of technology on society and global issues.